How are the roles of a king and a chief similar in terms of governance?

The roles of a king and a chief are similar in that both are often hereditary positions, meaning that the authority and leadership are passed down through family lines from one generation to another. This hereditary succession establishes continuity of governance and social order within their respective societies.

In many cultures, kings come from royal bloodlines, maintaining the legacy of a ruling family, while chiefs typically inherit their position from previous chiefs, often within the context of tribal or clan systems. This commonality underscores the importance of lineage and tradition in the political structures of societies that rely on these forms of governance.

The other options reflect activities or characteristics that may not universally apply to both kings and chiefs. For instance, coordinating military conquests can vary greatly depending on the societal structure and the specific duties assigned to leadership roles. Likewise, the administration of economic practices may differ significantly between a kingdom and a tribal system led by a chief. Elected authority is also generally not a trait associated with hereditary positions, as elections suggest a governance system based on choice rather than inheritance.